WVS Webinar on June 30. Individualism–Collectivism: Reconstructing Hofstede’s Dimension of Cultural Differences
Join us on June 30 for the next webinar, where Plamen Akaliyski (Lingnan University) will present recent research on individualism–collectivism and the measurement of cultural differences across societies. Drawing on data from the World Values Survey and European Values Study, the webinar revisits Hofstede’s widely used individualism–collectivism scores, examines their limitations, and introduces a new theory-driven index covering 102 countries and territories. The presentation will discuss the development and validation of the new measure and its implications for comparative research on culture, values, and societal development.
Register to attend: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/6kv6RsQnS8-79loBDUBnRA
Individualism–Collectivism: Reconstructing Hofstede’s Dimension of Cultural Differences
Individualism–collectivism (I-C), the most widely researched cultural dimension, is often equated with Hofstede’s pioneering nation scores. Concerns are growing about these scores’ validity, but subsequent research has not produced a widely accepted alternative. Here, we offer a refined theoretical conceptualization of I-C, systematically reevaluate the validity of Hofstede’s I-C scores, and report the development and validation of a new I-C index covering 102 countries and territories inhabited by an estimated 88% of the world’s population. In Study 1, we document the inferior convergent and nomological validity of Hofstede’s I-C index compared to subsequent measures. Hofstede’s scores substantially overestimate individualism in English-speaking countries and collectivism in East Asian societies, which we demonstrate can considerably bias research findings. In Study 2, we develop an authoritative, theory-driven I-C index using nationally representative data from the World Values Survey and European Values Study. The index shows excellent internal coherence, temporal stability, and strong evidence of convergent, discriminant, and nomological validity. Theorized facets of individualism—freedom (vs. conformity), tolerance of differences (vs. exclusion), and equality (vs. discrimination)—form a coherent and stable dimension at the cultural level of analysis. Individualism is higher in societies with better existential security, such as socioeconomic development and stable institutions, and is not associated with greater selfishness, anomie, or competitive beliefs and values. Relying on outdated indices may perpetuate cultural stereotypes and underpin flawed theorizing. Scholars should use theoretically appropriate and up-to-date measures of societal culture when seeking to understand global variation in human psychological functioning.
Plamen Akaliyski (PhD, University of Oslo) is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Sociology and Social Policy at Lingnan University, Hong Kong. His research focuses on global cultural value differences and change, examining factors such as historical legacies, environmental adaptations, and modernization processes. He has published more than 30 academic articles, including in leading journals such as Journal of International Business Studies, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, World Development, European Journal of Political Research, and Social Science & Medicine.
‹ back